Insights & Trends
The Open Web vs Walled Gardens: Why We Bet on Cross-Channel
Google and Meta control most ad budgets. We think that is a problem. Here is why Adxe exists on the open web.

Most advertising budgets flow to two places: Google and Meta. Combined, they control roughly 50% of all digital ad spend globally. They are effective platforms. We are not going to pretend otherwise. If you are running search ads on Google or retargeting on Instagram, those channels probably work for you and should remain part of your mix.
But we built Adxe to serve the other half of the internet. And we think that half is where the biggest untapped opportunities are right now. Here is why.
The Problem With Walled Gardens
When you advertise inside Google or Meta, you are playing by their rules exclusively. Their data, their attribution models, their auction mechanics, their reporting. You cannot independently verify what you are being told about performance. You cannot combine their data with signals from other channels in any meaningful way. And you are competing against every other advertiser in the world for the same finite pool of inventory.
This creates three problems that get worse over time:
Rising costs with no relief valve. CPMs inside walled gardens have increased 15-25% year over year for the past three years across most verticals we track. More advertisers competing for the same inventory means higher prices, and there is nothing you can do about it except pay more or accept less reach. The platforms have no incentive to lower prices when demand keeps growing.
On the open web, pricing dynamics work differently. There is more inventory, more competition among publishers for your spend, and more room for a smart bidding system to find efficient opportunities. Our clients consistently see lower CPMs on open programmatic compared to equivalent walled garden placements, often 30-50% lower for comparable audience quality.
Limited diversification creates fragility. If your entire advertising strategy depends on two platforms, you are one algorithm change away from a bad quarter. We have seen this happen repeatedly. A brand is running smoothly on Meta, hitting their CPA targets, scaling confidently. Then a targeting update rolls out, or the auction logic changes, and overnight their performance drops 30-40% with no clear explanation and no quick fix.
When your strategy is diversified across the open web, no single platform change can crater your performance. If one exchange or publisher underperforms, the system automatically shifts budget to others. That resilience is not optional anymore. It is a competitive advantage.
No true cross-channel view. You cannot build a unified customer journey when half your touchpoints are locked inside a walled garden that refuses to share data with the other half. Google will not tell you how your Meta campaigns influenced a search conversion, and Meta will not tell you how your CTV campaigns on the open web drove Instagram engagement. Each platform presents its own version of reality, and those versions do not talk to each other.
On Adxe, every channel, display, native, in-app, CTV, flows through a single system with shared data, shared attribution, and shared optimisation. You can actually see the full picture.
What the Open Web Offers
The open programmatic ecosystem gives advertisers something the walled gardens cannot provide: control, transparency, and diversification across thousands of publishers and apps.
On Adxe, you see exactly where your ads ran. Not just the platform name, but the specific publisher, the specific page, the specific placement. You see what you paid for each impression and how it performed. There is no black box. If something is not working, you can see why and fix it.
You can build cross-channel strategies that coordinate CTV, display, native, and in-app into a single coherent campaign with unified frequency management and sequential messaging. Users experience a journey rather than being bombarded by uncoordinated messages across disconnected platforms.
And you are accessing inventory that most of your competitors are ignoring because they are too focused on the duopoly. Premium publishers, streaming platforms, in-app environments, connected TV, all of these channels offer high-quality attention at more competitive prices than what you will find inside Google or Meta.
Our Position
We are not telling anyone to abandon Google or Meta entirely. For many brands, those platforms will remain a core part of the acquisition mix, especially for search intent capture and social retargeting. They have strengths that the open web does not replicate.
But the smartest advertisers we work with treat the open web as their growth engine. It is where they find new audiences that are not being saturated by every other competitor. It is where they test new channels like CTV and in-app that offer fundamentally different engagement dynamics. It is where they build competitive advantages that are not dependent on a single platform's algorithm or pricing decisions.
That is the bet we made when we built Adxe. A platform designed specifically for the open web, across every major channel, with the AI intelligence to make it perform. The results our clients are seeing, consistently lower CPAs, better diversification, and more resilient performance, tell us it was the right call.
OTHER BLOGS





